April 1917, Nashik, India
I am young in spirit though old in body. I do not wish to lose this privilege of youth. To deny the growing capacity to my thinking power is to admit that I have no right to speak on this resolution. Whatever I am going to speak today is eternally young. The body might grow old, decrepit and it might perish, but the soul is immortal. Similarly, if there might be an apparent lull in our Home Rule activities, the freedom of the spirit behind it is eternal and indestructible, and it will secure liberty for us.
The Soul means Parameshwar and the mind will not get peace till it gets identified with Him. If one body is worn out the soul will take another: so assures the Gita. This philosophy is quite old. Freedom is my birthright. So long as it is awake within me, I am not old. No weapon can cut this spirit, no fire can burn it, no water can wet it, no wind can dry it. I say further that no CID can burn it. I declare the same principle to the Superintendent of Police who is sitting before me, to the Collector who had been invited to attend this meeting and to the Government shorthand writer who is busy taking down notes of our speeches.
This principle will not disappear even if it seems to be killed. We ask for Home Rule and we must get it. The Science which ends in Home Rule is the Science of Politics and not the one which ends in slavery. The Science of Politics is the "Vedas" of the country. You have a soul and I only want to wake it up. I want to tear off the blind that has been let down by ignorant, designing and selfish people. The Science of Politics consists of two parts. The first is Divine and the second is Demonic. The slavery of a Nation comes into the latter part. There cannot be a moral justification for the Demonic part of the Science of Politics. A Nation which might justify this is guilty of sin in the sight of God. Some people have the courage to declare what is harmful to them and some have not that courage. The political and religious teaching consists in giving the knowledge of this principle. Religious and political teachings are not separate, though they appear to be so on account of foreign rule. All philosophies are included in the Science of Politics.
Who does not know the meaning of Home Rule? Who does not want it? Would you like it, if I enter your house and take possession of your cooking department? I must have the right to manage the affairs in my own house. It is only lunatics and children who do not know how to manage their own affairs.
The cardinal creed of the conferences is that a member must be above 21 years of age; do you not, therefore, think that you want your own rights? Not being lunatics or children you uuderstand your own business, your own rights and, therefore, you know Home Rule. We are told we are not fit for Home Rule. A century has passed away and the British Rule has not made us fit for Home Rule; now we will make our own efforts and fit ourselves for it.
To offer irrelevant excuses, to hold out any temptation and to make other offers will be putting a stigma on the English policy. England is trying to protect the small state of Belgium with the help of India; how can it then say that we should not have Home Rule? Those who find fault with us are avaricious people. But there are people who find fault even with the All-Merciful God. We must work hard to save the soul of our Nation without caring for anything. The good of our country consists in guarding this - our birthright. The Congress has passed this Home Rule resolution. The Provincial Conference is only a child of the Congress, which submits to mandates of its father. We will follow Shri Ramachandra in obeying the order of our father the Congress. We are determined to make efforts to get this resolution enforced even if the effort leads us to the desert, compels us to live incognito, makes us suffer any hardship and even if it finally brings us to death. Shri Ramachandra did it. Do not pass this resolution by merely clapping your hands but by taking a solemn vow that you will work for it. We will work for it by every possible constitutional and law-abiding method to get Home Rule.
Through the grace of God, England has changed its mind towards us. We feel our efforts will not be without success. England proudly thought that a tiny nation might be able to protect the Empire by itself. This pride has gone down. England has now begun to feel that it must make changes in the constitution of the Empire. Lloyd George has openly confessed that England cannot go on without the help of India. All notions about a Nation of a thousand years old have to be changed. The English people have discovered that the wisdom of all their parties is not sufficient. The Indian soldiers have saved the lives of the British soldiers on the French battlefield and have showed their bravery. Those who once considered us as slaves have begun now to call us brothers. God has brought about all these changes. We must push our demands while the notion of this brotherhood is existing in the minds of the English. We must inform them that we, thirty crores of the Indian people, are ready to lay down our lives for the Empire; and that while we are with them none shall dare cast an evil glance at the Empire.
What did inventor Alexander Graham Bell, philosopher Bertrand Russell, actor Cary Grant, actress Vanessa Redgrave, singer Bing Crosby, comedian Bob Hope, cellist Yo-Yo Ma, and Britain’s Princess Diana have in common? They all sent their children or grandchildren to schools inspired by Maria Montessori, the courageous woman who showed why freedom is absolutely essential for creativity and independence.
Despite sharp differences on political issues, people of every major culture and religion appreciate how Montessori schools set children free to learn. There are Montessori schools throughout Europe and the Americas. Montessori schools are well established in India. There are Montessori schools in mainland China. They are in Russia. They are expanding fast in Japan. There’s a Montessori school in remote Cambodia. Both Israel and the United Arab Emirates have Montessori schools. A Montessori school reportedly is being built in Somalia. Altogether, there are Montessori schools in 52 nations around the world.
Montessori schools thrive because children and parents love them. More than 90 percent of U.S. Montessori teachers, for instance, are in private schools where revenue comes from parents voluntarily–not from bludgeoned taxpayers. By contrast, the major U.S. teachers’ colleges, from Columbia on down, do their best to ignore Maria Montessori, treating her as a historical figure of little relevance now. Vast government teachers’ unions are uneasy about the freedom in Montessori classrooms.
This has always been a maverick movement. Defying “progressive” educators who molded children to fit a collectivist vision, Maria Montessori declared that the purpose of education is to help individuals fulfill their destiny. She rebelled against regimented schooling and insisted that children must have freedom to grow. She showed that children learn mainly by teaching themselves, not by having teachers drum knowledge into passive heads. Montessori established that children begin learning practically from birth, and education—the right kind—could start offering benefits much sooner than had been thought.
“The fundamental principle,” she wrote, “must be the liberty of the pupil;—such liberty as shall permit a development of individual, spontaneous manifestations of the child’s nature. If a new and scientific pedagogy is to arise from the study of the individual, such study must occupy itself with the observation of free children.”
Montessori was a formidable presence when, in 1906, she began making epic discoveries about how children learn. “In her late thirties,” wrote biographer Rita Kramer, “she was a somewhat portly figure, still handsome but putting on weight, still self-assured but a shade more dignified. She would come into a classroom wearing a simple but stylish dark-colored dress or shirtwaist, her dark hair piled neatly on top of her head, and smile at the children.” She had a “smooth, unwrinkled face and bright, clear eyes … poise and serenity.”
Montessori was born August 31, 1870, in Chiaravalle, Italy–the very year Italian states combined to form a new nation. Her father, Alessandro Montessori, was an official who managed the finances of a government-owned tobacco factory. Her mother, Renilde Stoppani, was the bookish daughter of a landed aristocrat.
When Maria was about five, Alessandro Montessori got a job as an accountant in Rome and moved the family there, so she would have access to a better education. She was encouraged to set her sights on teaching, since that was among the few professions available for women. Stubborn Maria, however, considered professions which were closed to women: first engineering, then biology and medicine. In 1896, she became Italy’s first woman doctor, but she wasn’t permitted to practice because it was unthinkable to have a woman examining a man’s body.
Montessori accepted an appointment as assistant doctor at the Psychiatric Clinic, University of Rome. This gave her an opportunity to observe “defectives”—children who, in modern parlance, were retarded, learning-disabled, or difficult for other reasons. These children were kept in crowded rooms without toys or much else to work with. As she observed them, she became convinced that their lives might be improved if they were treated more thoughtfully. Searching for ideas, she discovered the writings of Jean Itard and Edouard Seguin, French doctors who had spent their lives looking for better ways to educate such children.
In 1899, she spoke on the subject before a teachers’ conference, and it caused quite a stir. She was invited to become a lecturer at the University of Rome and director of the new Orthophrenic School for “defective” children. For two years, 1899 to 1901, Montessori searched feverishly for teaching techniques that could help these children. She spent about 12 hours a day observing them, working with them, trying out various ideas. She visited institutions for “defective” children in London and Paris. Incredibly, the children she taught learned to read and write as well as ordinary children.
Then came the anguish and joy of her life that led to a new career helping children around the world. At the Orthophrenic School, she worked with a Dr. Giuseppe Montesano. One thing led to another, and they had an affair. She gave birth to a son, Mario. It appears that Dr. Montesano refused to marry her—he soon married another woman. Her mother was certainly horrified that scandal could destroy her daughter’s career. Mario was sent to live with country cousins near Rome, and the whole business was hushed up. Biographer Kramer concluded that pregnancy as well as breaking up with Dr. Montesano must have occurred in 1901 when Maria suddenly resigned from the Orthophrenic School, dropped out of sight for about a year, and abandoned her successful work with “defective” children.
Imagine the anguish of this woman who was pressured to give up her own child, unable to share with him the benefits of her extraordinary insights that would help other people’s children around the world. For more than a decade, she visited him periodically without identifying herself. He thought of her as a mysterious “beautiful lady.” Not until after Maria’s mother died in 1912 did Mario come live with her.
Meanwhile, Montessori transformed her grief into a new vision for her life–improving education for normal children. She enrolled as a student at the University of Rome. She studied everything that might help her better understand how children learn. She took courses in psychology, anthropology, hygiene, and teaching. She visited elementary schools and noticed what teachers did and how children reacted. These schools had adopted the military-style method promoted in Prussia, the United States, and elsewhere: large numbers of students seated in rows before a teacher who instructed everyone at the same time. She reacted instinctively against the regimented teaching, the passivity of students, the system of rewards and punishments.
Casa dei Bambini
Montessori wrote magazine articles expressing her views, and one of them got the attention of Edouardo Talamo, an executive with a residential real-estate developer, the Institutio Romano dei Beni Stabili. Two of the firm’s new apartment buildings were being vandalized by young children living there, whose parents were away at work. Talamo concluded it was in the self-interest of the firm to start a school within each building, so the children would have constructive things to do and be properly supervised. He asked Montessori for advice. This was no plum job, because the buildings were in the impoverished, squalid, violent San Lorenzo section of Rome.
She offered to take on the project herself, despite objections from friends who considered it demeaning for a doctor to be teaching young children. Instead of the usual school desks, Montessori acquired child-sized chairs and tables for 50 or more three-to six-year-olds. She brought along self-correcting instructional materials which she had created for “defective” children, to help them learn sorting, fitting things together, and other skills essential for independence. Her observations suggested the need for additional materials, and gradually her repertoire expanded. She found that children learned abstract concepts more readily when materials involved all of a child’s senses, touch as well as sight and sound. Known as Casa dei Bambini—”Children’s House”—the school opened January 6, 1907.
The children were an unpromising lot—sullen, withdrawn, rebellious. Yet Montessori made a series of startling observations as she worked with them. She discovered children have a powerful, inborn desire to learn and to achieve independence. She saw how children learned spontaneously where they had enough freedom. They developed remarkable concentration on tasks that they chose. They preferred exploring real things–the world of grownups–rather than conventional toys. Classroom order was maintained without rewards and punishments when children were happily engaged. Children blossomed in an atmosphere of dignity, respect, and freedom.
Freedom, Not License
Although Montessori gave children considerable freedom, this didn’t mean they could do anything they wanted. She insisted children conduct themselves properly and treat others with respect. “The first idea that the child must acquire,” she wrote, “is that of the difference between good and evil; and the task of the educator lies in seeing that the child does not confound good with immobility, and evil with activity, as often happens in the case of old-time discipline. And all this because our aim is to discipline for activity, for work, for good; not for immobility, not for passivity, not for obedience…. A room in which all the children move about usefully, intelligently, and voluntarily, without committing any rough or rude act, would seem to me a classroom very well disciplined indeed.”
Montessori observed that children thrived when the teacher–whom she termed a “directress”—showed how to do something, then encouraged free exploration. She emphasized practical life skills to help children develop self-confidence and become more independent. Such skills included personal hygiene, putting materials back where they belonged, cleaning the classroom, preparing meals, taking care of plants and pets.
Like most people, Montessori had assumed that children wouldn’t be receptive to reading and writing until age six. But the young children in her classroom asked for instruction. She and her assistant made sets of script letters with markers enabling the children to tell which way was up. She devised exercises to help children learn the shapes and sounds of letters.
Within two months, she witnessed an explosion of writing. By Christmas, while government school children were still struggling with their letters, two of Montessori’s children—four-year-olds—wrote holiday greetings to building owner Edouardo Talamo. Montessori reported triumphantly: “These were written upon note paper without blot or erasure, and the writing was adjudged equal to that which is obtained in the third elementary grade.”
Contrary to prevailing doctrines, Montessori found that children best learned how to read after learning how to write. She prepared cards to label everyday objects, and she showed how to sound them out—the children already knew the sounds of individual letters. Within days, they were reading street signs, store signs, package labels, and just about everything else around them as well as books.
The Montessori Method
She began training teachers, opening more schools and writing books. Her first book was Il Metodo della Pedagogia Scientifica applicato all’ educazione infantile nelle Case dei Bambini. In 1912, it appeared in English as The Montessori Method and became an American bestseller. She was no abstract philosopher like her contemporary John Dewey. Rather, she was a doer who provided a specific model to help children learn and achieve independence. Her book was translated into Chinese, Danish, Dutch, French, German, Japanese, Polish, Romanian, Russian, and Spanish.
Montessori was a sensation. Aspiring teachers crossed the continent to be trained by her. In December 1913, she visited the United States where she met telephone inventor Alexander Graham Bell, electrical genius Thomas Edison, social worker Jane Addams, and Helen Keller who, though blind and deaf, had made herself a remarkably cultivated woman. During the next four decades, Montessori traveled throughout Europe and Asia–she trained over a thousand teachers in India alone.
Although Montessori schools sprung up around the world, her influence waned after the initial publicity about the Casa dei Bambini. Concerned that her work was being oversimplified, she insisted on total control of teacher training and of Montessori materials, and this alienated many supporters. She encountered ferocious opposition from academics, especially in the United States. The most influential adversary was William Heard Kilpatrick, a “progressive” follower of John Dewey and professor at prestigious Columbia University Teachers College. Montessori surely encountered opposition because she was a woman when school administrators and education professors were men. She was Catholic, which made a lot of Americans suspicious. Her academic training was as a medical doctor, not an educator. Finally, she was Italian. Americans had become disillusioned with President Woodrow Wilson’s intervention in World War I, which failed to “make the world safe for democracy” as he had promised, and they turned inward, away from Italy and just about everything else European.
Maria and her son and his family left Italy in 1936 when fascist dictator Benito Mussolini imposed government control over schools. They settled in Amsterdam, then spent World War II in India and returned to Amsterdam afterwards, promoting her ideas every step of the way. Most famous student of an Amsterdam Montessori school: a Jewish girl named Anne Frank whose poignant diary was published after she died in Hitler’s Bergen-Belsen concentration camp.
While chatting with friends in Noordwijk aan Zee, a North Sea Village not far from the Hague, Maria Montessori suffered a cerebral hemorrhage and died May 6, 1952. She was almost 82. Mario, who had become her training associate, was by her side. She considered her place wherever she happened to be, so she was buried at a Catholic church cemetery in Noordwijk.
When the obituary notices appeared, few Americans had any idea who she was. Rejecting failed “progressive” education and rooting around forgotten doctrines, though, some enterprising individuals rediscovered Montessori.
In Greenwich, Connecticut, a feisty, outspoken educator named Nancy McCormick Rambusch wasn’t satisfied with the offerings from local schools. She had read about how Montessori got great results giving children freedom to learn. Rambusch went to London for Montessori teacher training. Friends asked her to educate their children, and in 1958 she opened the Whitby School which sparked the American revival of Montessori.
Four years later, at Santa Monica (Calif.) Montessori School, former government school teacher Ruth Dresser led the revival on the West Coast—attracting celebrity parents like Robert Mitchum, Yul Brynner, Michael Douglas, Sarah Vaughn, and Cher.
Now there are 155 American schools accredited by Association Montessori Internationale (AMI), the group established by Maria Montessori in 1929 to uphold her standards. Another 800 schools are accredited by the American Montessori Association (AMS) which, started by Rambusch in 1960, considers some variations appropriate for American culture. About 3,000 more schools call themselves “Montessori.” In a dramatic turnabout, 200 government schools, embarrassed by revelations of their costly failures, have established “Montessori” programs.
My own son, Justin, goes to The Montessori School (AMI, Wilton, Connecticut), which is a wonder. It goes through the sixth grade. Tuition is around $5,000 versus the $10,000 per student local government schools spend. Like Montessori schools everywhere, mine welcomes parent classroom observations–discouraged in local government schools. You can see for yourself how children thrive when they are free to move about. You can see the intense, joyous concentration of children who freely choose their work. You can see children teach themselves important skills with Montessori materials. You can see children gain independence with the liberating spirit of Maria Montessori.
Jim Powell, senior fellow at the Cato Institute, is an expert in the history of liberty. He has lectured in England, Germany, Japan, Argentina and Brazil as well as at Harvard, Stanford and other universities across the United States. He has written for the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Esquire, Audacity/American Heritage and other publications, and is author of six books.